16 research outputs found

    Cohomology-Developed Matrices -- constructing families of weighing matrices and automorphism actions

    Full text link
    The aim of this work is to construct families of weighing matrices via their automorphism group action. This action is determined from the 0,1,20,1,2-cohomology groups of the underlying abstract group. As a consequence, some old and new families of weighing matrices are constructed. These include the Paley Conference, the Projective-Space, the Grassmannian, and the Flag-Variety weighing matrices. We develop a general theory relying on low dimensional group-cohomology for constructing automorphism group actions, and in turn obtain structured matrices that we call \emph{Cohomology-Developed matrices}. This "Cohomology-Development" generalizes the Cocyclic and Group Developments. The Algebraic structure of modules of Cohomology-Developed matrices is discussed, and an orthogonality result is deduced. We also use this algebraic structure to define the notion of \emph{Quasiproducts}, which is a generalization of the Kronecker-product

    Multilinear functional inequalities involving permanents, determinants, and other multilinear functions of nonnegative matrices and M-matrices

    Get PDF
    AbstractMotivated by a proof due to Fiedler of an inequality on the determinants of M-matrices and a recent paper by the authors, we now obtain various inequalities on permanents and determinants of nonsingular M-matrices. This is done by extending the multilinear considerations of Fiedler and, subsequently, of the authors, to fractional multilinear functionals on pairs of nonnegative matrices. Two examples of our results: For an n×n nonsingular M-matrix M (i) we give a sharp upper bound for det(M)+per(M), when M is a nonsingular M-matrix, (ii) we determine an upper bound on the relative error |per(M+E)−per(M)|/|per(M)|, when M+E is a certain componentwise perturbation of M

    An improvement of an inequality of Fiedler leading to a new conjecture on nonnegative matrices

    Get PDF
    summary:Suppose that AA is an n×nn\times n nonnegative matrix whose eigenvalues are λ=ρ(A),λ2,,λn\lambda = \rho (A), \lambda _2,\ldots , \lambda _n. Fiedler and others have shown that det(λIA)λnρn\det (\lambda I - A) \le \lambda ^n - \rho ^n, for all λ>ρ\lambda > \rho , with equality for any such λ\lambda if and only if AA is the simple cycle matrix. Let aia_i be the signed sum of the determinants of the principal submatrices of AA of order i×ii\times i, i=1,,n1i = 1,\ldots ,n - 1. We use similar techniques to Fiedler to show that Fiedler’s inequality can be strengthened to: det(λIA)+i=1n1ρn2iai(λρ)iλnρn\det (\lambda I - A) + \sum _{i = 1}^{n - 1} \rho ^{n - 2i}|a_i|(\lambda - \rho )^i \le \lambda ^n -\rho ^n, for all λρ\lambda \ge \rho . We use this inequality to derive the inequality that: 2n(ρλi)ρn2i=2n(ρλi)\prod _{2}^{n}(\rho - \lambda _i) \le \rho ^{n - 2}\sum _{i = 2}^{n}(\rho - \lambda _i). In the spirit of a celebrated conjecture due to Boyle-Handelman, this inequality inspires us to conjecture the following inequality on the nonzero eigenvalues of AA: If λ1=ρ(A),λ2,,λk\lambda _1 = \rho (A),\lambda _2,\ldots , \lambda _k are (all) the nonzero eigenvalues of AA, then 2k(ρλi)ρk2i=2k(ρλ)\prod _{2}^{k}(\rho - \lambda _i) \le \rho ^{k-2}\sum _{i = 2}^{k}(\rho -\lambda ). We prove this conjecture for the case when the spectrum of AA is real

    An algorithm for constructing and classifying the space of small integer weighing matrices

    Full text link
    In this paper we describe an algorithm for generating all the possible PIW(m,n,k)PIW(m,n,k) - integer m×nm\times n Weighing matrices of weight kk up to Hadamard equivalence. Our method is efficient on a personal computer for small size matrices, up to mn=12m\le n=12, and k50k\le 50. As a by product we also improved the \textit{\textbf{nsoks}} \cite{riel2006nsoks} algorithm to find all possible representations of an integer kk as a sum of nn integer squares. We have implemented our algorithm in \texttt{Sagemath} and as an example we provide a complete classification for \ n=m=7n=m=7 and k=25k=25. Our list of IW(7,25)IW(7,25) can serve as a step towards finding the open classical weighing matrix W(35,25)W(35,25)
    corecore